Guy admits to torturing pet toy poodle whilst filming abuse

Table of Contents ‘Deliberate and persistent acts of abuse’Incriminated himself A screenshot of a movie…

A screenshot of a video showing Clement Chia abusing the poodle. (PHOTO: SPCA Facebook)

A screenshot of a movie showing Clement Chia abusing the poodle. (Picture: SPCA Fb)

SINGAPORE — In excess of the training course of about a calendar year, 42-year-aged Singaporean Clement Chia frequently punched and tied up his pet toy poodle. From time to time, he would hit it with a tricky-plastic hanger and even got his cousin Chia Yong-Quan, 38, to film the abuse.

On one particular situation, Clement sure the poodle’s entrance legs jointly and forced it to stand upright on its hind legs, even though soaked, right before a fan with wind blowing straight at it, producing it to shiver. All around 18 seconds later on, the poodle’s hind legs turned weak and it had issue standing.  

In a 76-2nd lengthy clip, Clement can be listened to threatening the poodle by saying “A single extra time down … I slap you” before commenting in Mandarin that the poodle’s eyes were being damp as it was tearing.

The poodle, named Leslie, grew so weak that it at some point fell and was unable to continue to be upright. Clement then scolded and threatened Leslie, pulled its ear and neck to pressure it to remain upright before the lover once more, and said that he would punch the poodle.

In another clip, self-recorded by Clement, he posed for the digital camera just before pulling the poodle up by its ears, and frequently punching its experience. He then grabbed the poodle by its hind legs and swung it, although smirking at the digital camera.

On Wednesday, Clement pleaded guilty to 4 expenses beneath the Animals and Birds Act of cruelly torturing the poodle. The offences have been dedicated sometime involving October 2016 and November 2017 in his Farrer Park Street flat.

Two other fees of possessing the poodle in breach of the licensing prerequisites and failing to provide it to a vet to attain the essential clinical interest will be taken into thing to consider for his sentencing on 7 October. 

Sentencing was adjourned by District Judge Lorraine Ho as she experienced asked for a statement from Clement’s ex-girlfriend, in buy to uncover out the condition of the doggy when he gave it to her.

Final month, Yong-Quan was fined $4,500 for failing to halt his cousin from committing the abuse. He was also disqualified from possessing pets for a year.

‘Deliberate and persistent acts of abuse’

The offences arrived to light in July 2020 when six movie clips of Clement torturing the poodle went viral. A number of associates of the general public alerted the Animal and Veterinary Service of the National Parks Board of the abuse.

According to court docket files, Leslie was all-around four yrs outdated at the time of the offences and was acquired by Clement some time in 2016 for $2,000. It was adopted by Clement’s ex-girlfriend in November 2017.

Just about every of Clement’s expenses carries a sentencing array of up to 18 months’ jail and/or a fine of up to $15,000 for to start with-time offenders.

Deputy Community Prosecutor (DPP) Norine Tan is looking for a sentence of 8 to 12 months’ jail for Clement, as effectively as a 12-thirty day period disqualification get blocking him from owning pets. 

Just before 2015, the sentencing assortment was reduce – up to 12 months and a $10,000 great. This was improved by Parliament in 2014 immediately after having on board the views of the Animal Welfare Laws Critique Committee.

DPP Tan pointed out that Clement’s stage of culpability is high, specified the “deliberate and persistent functions of abuse” and the agony and struggling he experienced inflicted on the defenceless poodle, which was especially susceptible offered its relatively little establish.

Incriminated himself

The DPP observed that Clement is not a initial-time offender. Amongst his several offences, he was formerly convicted of rioting, as very well as riotous/disorderly/indecent behaviour.

DPP Tan rejected Clement’s declare that he was basically disciplining the poodle, supplied that his acts exceeded any acceptable act of willpower, if that was even the intention. 

“Further more, disciplining does not call for 1 to film the acts – allow on your own smile and smirk at, and pose for, the digicam,” she included, noting it was “ironic” that Clement was now incriminated by his have choice to history the abuse. 

“In most instances of animal abuse, there would not be any proof or witnesses.”

Remain in the know on-the-go: Sign up for Yahoo Singapore’s Telegram channel at